tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499583311323134897.post4391008764544055778..comments2023-05-10T10:36:20.146-05:00Comments on Defending the Realm: Taylor KO FactorThe Archduke of Arrogancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11489016995391993623noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499583311323134897.post-38491561480259253762009-01-13T09:08:00.001-06:002009-01-13T09:08:00.001-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.Harpo111https://www.blogger.com/profile/12797091939012065409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499583311323134897.post-59905232062308217252009-01-13T09:08:00.000-06:002009-01-13T09:08:00.000-06:00No, is right. With the same style bullet, the .45a...No, is right. With the same style bullet, the .45acp will, with similar velocity or even weight...score higher the a .40 due to diameter. It has to do with the size hole the bullet will create on entry. With a difference of only like two or three...there really is no difference. Take my 58 caliber muzzle loader. A 315gr bullet at 1300fps gets a score in the 30s. A 500gr minnie gets a score in the 50s...that is a sizeable difference and really means something on the receiving end. From my experience...a 40s&w with a 180gr at 950fps is doing to be identical performance to a 45acp at 850fps....if bullet type is the same.<BR/>kHarpo111https://www.blogger.com/profile/12797091939012065409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499583311323134897.post-11773274498158803482008-08-05T13:33:00.000-05:002008-08-05T13:33:00.000-05:00There must be something wrong with this formula. M...There must be something wrong with this formula. My 40 s & w load is showing to be less effective than your 45acp.King Selfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14010470624885290464noreply@blogger.com