tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499583311323134897.post7440070310610804134..comments2023-05-10T10:36:20.146-05:00Comments on Defending the Realm: Lay Down SallyThe Archduke of Arrogancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11489016995391993623noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499583311323134897.post-15321590783178597792007-09-18T12:11:00.000-05:002007-09-18T12:11:00.000-05:00I came this close to posting a rant about the idio...I came this close to posting a rant about the idiocy of the flying nut. Not only did your post save me the trouble, but I now see that I was approaching the incident from the wrong direction. Instead of using her acceptance speech as an opportunity for learning, I was going to spew about the devastating stupidity of her and her kind. Thanks for setting me straight.<BR/><BR/>After writing the paragraph above, I went online and listened to her speech again, hoping to gain a new insight into her thinking. I discovered that in the part of her speech which sounded like incoherent rambling, she was trying to explain why there would be no wars if women ruled the world. It turns out that the primary reason is that without men there would be no one around to invent all the cool instruments of war. That might be a good thing. Without men ruling the world we would have never heard of Sally Field because there would have been no one to invent television. <BR/><BR/>Topu=funnyKing Selfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14010470624885290464noreply@blogger.com